Research synthesis, with its receipts

Turn a pile of sources into a brief you can defend.

Priormind reads your papers, links and notes and returns a cited synthesis that keeps agreements, conflicts and unknowns separate — then turns it into concept maps and a short explainer clip. Built for people who get asked “where did that come from?”

Inline source tags·Conflicts flagged·USD pricing from $0
Scattered research sources converging into one structured, cited brief
Is

a cited first-draft synthesis of your own sources

Is

a way to see agreements, conflicts and unknowns side by side

Is not

peer review, or a medical / legal / financial opinion

Is not

a way to skip verifying claims against the primary source

The workflow

Chat, figures, explainer clip — one continuous thread

Every stage carries the sources forward, so nothing is asserted without a way to trace it back.

01 · Chat

Drop your sources, ask the real question

Paste papers, links, notes or raw data and ask what you actually need to know. Priormind returns a structured synthesis with inline source tags — not a confident paragraph with no receipts.

  • Inline [S1]-style source tags on every claim
  • Agreements, conflicts and unknowns kept separate
  • Single-source claims flagged for caution
Synthesised research summary with inline source citation tags
02 · Figures

Turn the conclusion into a figure you can read

Once the logic is clear, generate concept maps, comparison matrices, timelines and annotated chart drafts. Data points stay blank until you verify them against the primary source.

  • Concept maps and relationship diagrams
  • Comparison matrices with conflicts highlighted
  • Chart drafts with data points left blank
Concept map showing relationships between research ideas
03 · Explainer clip

Ship a 60–90s explainer for people who won't read the brief

Package the core conclusions into a short, captioned explainer clip in 16:9 and 9:16. Every clip ends on a sources-and-disclaimer card, so nothing gets shared without its caveats.

  • 16:9 for decks and 9:16 for quick mobile viewing
  • Captions on by default, neutral score optional
  • Automatic sources & disclaimer end card
Still frame from a captioned explainer clip
The evidence ledger

Where they agree, where they clash, what's still unknown

A real shape of a Priormind brief. Conflicts and single-source claims are flagged in amber so you never mistake one paper's claim for a consensus.

6 clinical papers

Across the six sources, treatment produces substantial weight loss during active dosing [S1][S3][S4], with the largest effects reported in trials combining higher doses and lifestyle support [S2]. The papers converge on a rebound pattern once dosing stops, but disagree on its magnitude and durability.

Agreements
  • Active-dose weight loss is large and consistent [S1][S3][S4]
  • Gastrointestinal side effects are the most common discontinuation reason [S2][S5]
Conflicts
  • !Regain after cessation: one source reports ~two-thirds returns [S1]; another reports roughly half [S4]
  • !Whether maintenance dosing fully prevents regain [S2] vs partial only [S6]
Single-source claims
  • !Muscle-mass loss estimate is supported by only one paper [S6]
Still unknown
  • ·Effects beyond 4 years
  • ·Outcomes in adolescents

Verify every claim against the primary source before you rely on it.

Figure library

Pick the figure that fits the argument

Concept maps, matrices, timelines, quadrants and annotated charts — generated from your synthesis, with data points left blank until you verify them.

Timeline / evolution figure
Timeline
Flow and causal diagram
Flow & causal
Venn overlap diagram
Overlap (Venn)
Hierarchy tree diagram
Hierarchy tree
Four-quadrant positioning figure
Quadrant
Funnel / filtering figure
Funnel
Annotated chart figure
Annotated chart
Pros and cons figure
Pros & cons
Stack of academic papers
Papers & PDFs
Raw survey data
Survey & raw data
Web articles and links
Web articles & links
Personal notes and excerpts
Notes & excerpts
Sources → synthesis → figures

Export the whole research pack in one move

When you're done, export a single pack: the brief as markdown, every figure, the explainer clip and a clean source list — ready to check against your primary sources and share.

Three-step flow from scattered sources to a synthesis to clean figures
Pricing

Simple USD subscriptions, quotas that match how you work

Quotas are metered service usage per billing period — not a stored or withdrawable balance, and they don't roll over.

Notebook

For getting a feel of the research workflow.

$0forever
3 briefs / month
Start free
Most chosen
Analyst

For researchers turning many sources into defensible briefs.

$18/ month
60 briefs / month
Choose Analyst
Lab

For analysts and consultants shipping formal deliverables.

$94/ month
Unlimited briefs
Choose Lab

Compare every feature on the full pricing page.

In practice

Built for people who get asked to prove it

The conflict flags changed how I write. I stopped presenting a single-source claim as settled fact, because Priormind literally labels it.
Daniel Osei
Daniel Osei
Independent researcher
I brief three partners a week. A cited synthesis plus a 90-second clip means nobody asks me to 'just summarise it' anymore.
Priya Naidoo
Priya Naidoo
Industry analyst
It tells me what is not statistically meaningful before I over-claim in a deck. That caution is the whole reason I pay for it.
Marco Feld
Marco Feld
Management consultant
FAQ

Answers before you ask

No. Priormind produces a first-draft synthesis with citations to help you navigate faster. AI can generate inaccurate citations and conclusions, so you must verify every claim against the primary source before you rely on or publish it.

Stop presenting one paper's claim as settled fact

Start free with three briefs a month. Upgrade when you need multi-source synthesis, figures and explainer clips.

8 Quarles Park Road, Romford, Essex, United Kingdom, RM6 4DE